On 31 July The Clinton campaign released a letter from Hillary’s personal physician Lisa Bardack, MD, a board certified Internist, basically saying that her health was excellent.
Well it isn’t and her letter essentially proves that she had a stroke in December of 2012. Here’s why.
First: a timeline.
At some time in the week of 9 December 2012 Mrs. Clinton is said to have fainted suffering a concussion. The New York Times reported on this 13 December.
She remained at home until 31 December at which point she was admitted to New York-Presbyterian Hospital when a blood clot was found in a vein draining the brain. (12 August — correction. She was admitted 30 December).
Subsequently she had double vision due to her eye muscles not working together for a month or so and had to wear special glasses to correct this.
Second: The following explanation for these events was given by Dr. Bardach. You may read the entire letter at http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/clintonhealth2015.pdf but the relevant paragraph is directly quoted below.
“In December of 2012, Mrs. Clinton suffered a stomach virus after traveling, became dehydrated, fainted and sustained a concussion. During follow up evaluations, Mrs. Clinton was found to have a transverse sinus venous thrombosis and began anticoagulation therapy to dissolve the clot. As a result of the concussion, Mrs. Clinton also experienced double vision for a period of time and benefited from wearing glasses with a Fresnel Prism. Her concussion including the double vision, resolved within two months and she discontinued the use of the prism. She had followup testing in 2013, which revealed complete resolution of the effects of the concussion as well as total dissolution of the thrombosis. Mrs. Clinton also tested negative for all clotting disorders. As a precaution, however, it was decided to continue her on daily anticoagulation.”
Third: Why should you believe what yours truly, a neurologist and not a neurosurgeon says about the minimal likelihood of this clot being due to the head trauma she sustained when she fainted? Neurologists rarely deal with acute head trauma although when the smoke clears we see plenty of its long term side effects (post-traumatic epilepsy, cognitive and coordination problems etc. etc.). I saw plenty of it in soldiers when I was in the service ’68 – ’70, but this was after they’d been stabilized and shipped stateside. However, I had an intense 42 month experience managing acute head injuries.
To get my kids through college, I took a job working for two busy neurosurgeons. When I got there, I was informed that I’d be on call every other night and weekend, taking first call with one of the neurosurgeons backing me up. Fortunately, my neurosurgical backup was excellent, and I learned and now know far more about acute head trauma than any neurologist should. We admitted some of the head trauma cases to our service, but most cases had trauma to other parts of the body, so a general surgeon would run the show with our group as consultants. I was the initial consultant in half the cases. When I saw them initially, I followed the patients until discharge. On weekends I covered all our patients and all our consults, usually well over 20 people.
We are told that Hillary had a clot in one of the large draining veins in the back of her head (the transverse dural venous sinus). I’d guess that I saw over 300 cases of head trauma,but I never saw a clot develop in a dural sinus due to the trauma. I’ve spoken to two neuroradiologists still in practice, and they can’t recall seeing such a clot without a skull fracture over the sinus. Such a fracture has never been mentioned at any time about Hillary.
Hillary’s neurologic deficit involved a nerve going to the muscles of her left eye. These start in the brainstem, a part of the brain quite near the site where she is said to have had the clot in her vein. The brainstem is crucial in maintaining consciousness, and it is more likely that the faint earlier in December was a warning sign of the stroke she had subsequently.
Why does the letter essentially prove Hillary had a stroke back then ?
I find it impossible to believe that the double vision occurred when she fainted. No MD in their right mind would not immediately hospitalize a case of head trauma with a neurologic deficit such as double vision. This is just as true for the most indigent patient as for the Secretary of State.
My guess was that the double vision came up later — probably after Christmas. Who gets admitted to the hospital the day of New Year’s Eve? Only those with symptoms requiring immediate attention. Update 9 August — an alert reader asked how I knew she was admitted during the day and not in the evening. It made me Google this point further — finding this http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/clinton-admitted-hospital-blood-clot-015548623–politics.html — showing that she was admitted 30 December. Thanks Joe.
Dr. Bardack’s letter states, “As a precaution,however, it was decided to continue her on daily anticoagulation.” I couldn’t agree more. However, this is essentially an admission that she is at significant risk to have more blood clots. While anticoagulation is not without its own risks, it’s a lot safer now than it used to be. Chronic anticoagulation is no walk in the park for the patient (or for the doctor). The most difficult cases of head trauma we had to treat were those on anticoagulants. They always bled more.
Dr. Bardack’s letter is quite clever. She never comes out and actually says that the head trauma caused the clot, but by the juxtaposition of the first two sentences, the reader is led to that conclusion. Suppose, Dr. Bardack was convinced that the trauma did cause the clot. Then there would be no reason for her to subject Mrs. Clinton to the risks of anticoagulation, given that the causative agent was no longer present. In all the cases of head trauma we saw, we never prescribed anticoagulants on discharge (unless we had to for non-neurosurgical reasons). I certainly agree with her use of anticoagulation, as I highly doubt that the trauma had anything at all to do with the blood clot in the transverse sinus. It is even possible that the clot was there all the time and caused the faint in early December.
The really important medical data would be Dr. Bardack’s office notes from December and the consultations of the neurosurgeon and admitting physician at Presbyterian 31 December, but I doubt that we’ll ever see them.
Why does this matter? Fortunately, Mrs. Clinton has recovered. However, statistically a person who has had one stroke is far more likely to have another than a person who has never had one. This is particularly true when we don’t know what caused the first (as in this case).
We’ve had two presidents neurologically impaired by stroke in the past century (Woodrow Wilson after World War I and Franklin Delano Roosevelt at Yalta). The decision they made in that state were not happy for the USA or the world.
Lest you regard this as anti-Hillary, concern for the health of future presidents is not confined to Democratic candidates. Reagan’s age was raised as a legitimate issue by his opponents as Christie’s near-morbid obesity should be if he gets the Republican nomination. The resignation of Thomas Eagleton, the first running mate of George McGovern in 1972 because he had a history of electroshock therapy for depression, again shows that these concerns are not limited to any time or party.
Addendum 14 Aug ’15: Will be away from the net for several weeks. If you’ve commented after that, you’ve not been ignored or rejected, just held till I get back.