What do Richard Feynman and Charles Darwin have in common? Both have written books which show a brilliant mind at work. I’ve started reading the New Millennium Edition of Feynman’s Lectures on Physics (which is the edition you should get as all 1165 errata found over the years have been corrected), and like Darwin his thought processes and their power are laid out for all to see. Feynman’s books are far from F = ma. They are basically polished versions of lectures, so it reads as if Feynman is directly talking to you. Example: “We have already discussed the difference between knowing the rules of the game of chess and being able to play.” Another: talking about Zeno “The Greeks were somewhat confused by such problems, being helped, of course, by some very confusing Greeks.”
He’s always thinking about the larger implications of what we know. Example: “Newton’s law has the peculiar property that if it is right on a certain small scale, then it will be right on a larger scale”
He then takes this idea and runs with it. “Newton’s laws are the ‘tail end’ of the atomic laws extrapolated to a very large size” The fact that they are extrapolatable and the fact that way down below are the atoms producing them means, that extrapolatable laws are the only type of physical law which could be discovered by us (until we could get down to the atomic level). Marvelous. Then he notes that the fundamental atomic laws (e.g. quantum mechanics) are NOTHING like what we see in the large scale environment in which we live.
If you like this sort of thing, you’ll love the books. I don’t think they would be a good way to learn physics for the first time however. No problems, etc. etc. But once you’ve had exposure to some physics “it is good to sit at the feet of the master” — Bill Gates.
Most of the readership is probably fully engaged with work, family career and doesn’t have time to actually read “The Origin of Species”. In retirement, I did,and the power of Darwin’s mind is simply staggering. He did so much with what little information he had. There was no clear idea of how heredity worked and at several points he’s a Lamarckian — inheritance of acquired characteristics. If you do have the time I suggest that you read the 1859 book chapter by chapter along with a very interesting book — Darwin’s Ghost by Steve Jones (published in 1999) which update’s Darwin’s book to contemporary thinking chapter by chapter. Despite the advances in knowledge in 140 years, Darwin’s thinking beats Jones hands down chapter by chapter.
Chemiotics II 