Tag Archives: Andrew Slavitt

How a doctor must learn to think

The previous post (found just below) is a textbook example of how a doctor (e.g. me) thinks about medical issues.

“A steady rise in COVID-19 is continuing this week as the state reported 208 new cases Wednesday.

Updated data from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health shows that new cases last week rose 46% over the previous week. The updated percentage includes cases from last week that were reported Wednesday. It’s the second week in a row that cases rose after more than two months of decline that hit a pandemic low the week of June 20.”

Well those are the first two paragraphs of https://www.masslive.com/coronavirus/2021/07/just-one-month-aver-hitting-pandemic-lows-new-covid-cases-in-massachusetts-continue-to-rise-as-delta-variant-spreads.html

Which led to the post

Here are the next two paragraphs

“Deaths continue to remain low, however, with one new COVID death being reported on Wednesday. A total of 17,648 Massachusetts residents have died from the virus since the start of the pandemic.

Hospitalizations ticked back up to 102 after hitting a low of 80 on July 4. They have slowly been trending back up since then. Of the hospitalizations, 37 are in intensive care and 17 are intubated.”


If they led with the second two paragraphs no one would have read the article.
This is typical in several ways of the medical literature


l. Make the most spectacular claim you can first off to grab the readers attention — we’re in another wave of the epidemic

2. The actual data don’t seem to support the lead (things just aren’t that bad).

Eventually I’d read each medical paper wondering how the authors were lying to me — for a horrible example (from Johns Hopkins yet — please see   https://luysii.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/low-socioeconomic-status-in-the-first-5-years-of-life-doubles-your-chance-of-coronary-artery-disease-at-50-even-if-you-became-a-doc-or-why-i-hated-reading-the-medical-literature-when-i-had-to/

So now the doc has to deal with two conflicting pieces of information.  This never happens in math (which is why I love reading it in retirement).  You can prove anything from assuming a statement and its negation are both true.  Here’s how Bertrand Russell proved that he was the Pope starting with 1 = 2. “Either the Pope and I are one person or we are two people. If 1=21=2 then in either case we are one person. Therefore, I am the Pope.”


So the doc has to reach into his/her store of knowledge to figure it out.  Well, he/she knows that most COVID-19 stay in the hospital for longer than a day.  Clearly not all the 208 cases wound up in the hospital as there were only 102 COVID-19 cases in the hospital.  I’m guessing that the median (not average) length of hospital stay for COVID-19 is two weeks.


But it’s more complicated than that (https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/chart-of-the-week-how-long-do-covid-19-patients-spend-in-hospital) as in England the median length of stay ranged from 5 to 10 in the past year.


So how many ‘cases’ of COVID-19 were there in Massachusetts — the excellent statistics of the Department of Health says about 1,000 in the past two weeks.
So if there are only 100 in hospital and the average stay is 10 days (I couldn’t find data for Massachusetts — again this is typical of medical practice — you can’t find the data you really want), 90% of the COVID-19 cases aren’t severe enough to be hospitalized.


This led to the conclusion in the first part of the post “What does the rise in COVID-19 cases mean?  NOT MUCH.”


The data is quite similar to that from Los Angeles — http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/media/coronavirus/data/index.html
1,827 cases on the 17th, 500 COVID-19 cases in the hospital.  Assume that cases are rising and figure 1,000 cases/day over the past 10 days, and you get to 95% of ‘cases’ not sick enough to be hospitalized.


When the normal person thinks of a ‘case’ of a disease, they think of someone who is physically ill.  Not so with COVID-19, and this is incredibly dishonest reporting by the press, various health departments etc. etc.


My post ends with “Presently nearly all the deaths from COVID-19 are in people who were not vaccinated, so to lower your odds further please get vaccinated.”

I couldn’t track this down to any sort of hard data.  It certainly is plausible, but how may plausible medical ideas have I seen crash and burn.  The Associated Press quotes a former official in the Obama administration making this claim.  At least they identify him Andrew Slavitt — a former investment banker — rather than an anonymous source.

Addendum 21 July

“There’s a common theme among those behind the worsening COVID-19 numbers, said Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:

“This is becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” Walensky said at a COVID-19 briefing Friday.”

More than 97% of people getting hospitalized with COVID-19 now are unvaccinated, Walensky said. And 99.5% of deaths are among the unvaccinated, US Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy said Sunday.”

Even more reason to get vaccinated.


What is a ‘case’ of COVID-19

What does the rise in COVID-19 cases mean?  NOT MUCH.  Here’s how the local paper played it — https://www.masslive.com/coronavirus/2021/07/just-one-month-aver-hitting-pandemic-lows-new-covid-cases-in-massachusetts-continue-to-rise-as-delta-variant-spreads.html

There were 208 ‘cases’ today 14 July 2021   in Massachusetts, which is a rate 46% higher than last week. In the past two weeks there have been about 1,000 cases according to the Massachusetts department of health. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/covid-19-response-reporting#covid-19-interactive-data-dashboard-

So the hospitals must be packed and deaths must be soaring.  Right?

Wrong — the same article tells us that there are currently 100 people in Massachusetts hospitals with COVID-19 and that there was one death today

This means that what they are calling a case of COVID-19 is not enough to put 90% of people with it in the hospital.  Most of the ‘cases’ of COVID-19 in Massachusetts are either asymptomatic or mild.

It’s hard to find comparable statistics from states with lower vaccination rates (e.g. the south) but deaths are also lower there.

Well what about the Delta variant?  It is definitely more infectious, and the disease it causes is more severe.  We should be in big trouble if Delta takes over in the USA.  Right?

Wrong.  Delta has taken over.  According to the CDC, Delta accounts for 58% of all new cases of COVID-19 in the USA — https://abcnews.go.com/Health/delta-variant-now-accounts-58-covid-19-cases/story?id=78834579.   Deaths have not spiked.  The vaccines are working.

Presently nearly all the deaths from COVID-19 are in people who were not vaccinated, so to lower your odds further please get vaccinated.

My friends and I did — https://luysii.wordpress.com/2021/05/19/anti-vaxers-what-is-it-that-you-know-that-we-dont/