A friend of my son once said that all you needed was the first one or two measures of anything Bach wrote to know how the rest of the piece would go. So it is with the New York Times. The lead about the primary campaign 3 Feb ’16 contains the terms “Army, Attack, Dispatches” and the sublead contains the term “Establishment”.
Do you think this article is about Hillary?
Of course not. This is branding at its finest. Of whom? Of a viable Republican candidate (Rubio), so you’ll know just what to think about him without even reading the article.
Another article on the front page has a nice picture of Hillary. They mention that she won Iowa by the narrowest of margins, but nothing about how surprising this was given that she has the entire mainstream press and Democratic party establishment (term not used) on her side.
It’s why the mainstream press must be read the way the Russians (and the CIA) read Pravda during the cold war.
Addendum 4 Feb ’16 — When Barack Obama won the Iowa caucus in 2008, the press went bananas and noted that this was the first time a Black candidate won the Iowa caucus.
Have you read anything about the first Latino to win the Iowa caucus (Cruz) or that another came in third (Rubio) and that a Black candidate came in fourth (Carson), the three receiving an aggregate 60% of the vote in lily white Iowa? I thought not. That’s because the narrative that Republicans are racist must be upheld at all costs.
Second addendum 4 Feb ’16 — I should have looked at the editorial page of the Times before writing the above. There is still nothing in the mainstream ‘news’ feeds about the Latino victory even now. The Op-ed page contains “The Latino Political First We’re Ignoring”. The victories of Rubio and Cruz are noted. The op-ed notes that “it is not being celebrated”. So who is “we” and who is not celebrating? “No less an arbiter than Jorge Ramos the Univision anchor” and La Opinion, the nation’s largest Spanish language newspaper. One must ask who elected the arbiter and the editorial board of the La Opinion? No one. More media types holding forth in their echo chamber Another example of self selected spokesmen being blindsided by events.
On the same opinion page we are told “The Republican establishment is thrilled” about Rubio by Gail Collins. This continues the meme on the front page yesterday of Rubio being the establishment.
I have no problem with Collins or the op-ed about Cruz and Rubio’s victory. They are opinions and on the opinion page where they belong. The problem was yesterday’s front page opinion piece masquerading as news.